'Cause they were like, "this article is too speculative. You have all this speculative language, like "possibly happened" and "seems like." And you draw all these speculative conclusions. We do not like it! Too much speculation."
So I am going through and deleting all of the speculative language, but keeping the speculative conclusions. Now, instead of saying, "It seems like [totally speculative thing] may have happened," it says, "And then, reader, [totally speculative thing] totally happened! For real!"
Mwwaahhaaha!!!
And once again, peer reviewers are going down thanks to their own sucky-ness! YEAH!
2 comments:
You do a great job of finding terrific graphics to illustrate your points.
Also, I think your peer reviewers are essentially correct. And your reaction to their peer review is terrific as well.
If I've learned anything from our current political dialog it's that nobody cares about your hunch. But if you state your hunch as a bonafied fact, well then, you too can be a Republican Congressman.
Yeah!
Post a Comment